Test that assesses the mechanical/technical understanding using animated items (instruments, to which a construction plan must be assigned); to be used with adolescents and adults.
Theoretical background
In psychology there is a multitude of terms like “technical/constructive” or “practical/technical understanding”, which are used in connection with mechanical/technical understanding. Pauli & Arnold (1972) limit the definition in the following way: “Technical understanding broadly contains the following abilities:
to understand and describe technical drawings or instruments and to describe their usefulness
to recognize the functional importance of the individual parts and to explain their coaction
to correctly understand and describe basic technical laws (e.g. the effect of the lever), with which everybody is acquainted in daily life
the personal inner connection with technical problems (eagerness or revulsion).”
The MTA tries to cover the above-mentioned abilities from points a–c.
Administration
In the first run, 4 plans per instrument are presented. The task consists of finding the one plan, which does not allow the sequence of movements shown before (in an animation). If all four constructions allow this sequence of movements, then the answer “all constructions are correct” must be selected. In the second run, either one of the 4 plans per instrument must be selected as correct or the answer can be “all constructions are incorrect”. So in the first run one incorrect plan must be discovered among the four plans presented per instrument, whereas in the second run one correct plan must be found. The test has an “item-related time-limit”. This means that the next item appears automatically after a certain time interval (2 minutes) has elapsed.
Scoring
The defined test score is the number of items solved.
Reliability
The reliability in the sense of an inner consistency is given due to the validity of the Rasch model. The following characteristic values for reliability were calculated: split-half-reliability r=0.87, Cronbach’s alpha r=0.84 and Guttman’s lambda 3 r=0.84.
Validity
Since the tasks of the MTA coincide by their content as well as formally with those of other mechanical/technical tests that were checked for their external validity, the external validity is deemed to be secure also for them. One external validity criterion (positive/negative completed retraining in a technical profession, r=.47) confirms the selection quality of the MTA.
Simona Ion, KBC We really appreciated the proactive and continuous communication with us from the consultants managing our businesses.(...) Following these projects we have not only established a long-term business partnership, but also a pleasant relationship with Hart’s team. Simona Ion, KBC
Adriana Pirvu, Learning & Development Coordinator Cargill Romania We hereby confirm our successful collaboration with HART Consulting that represents Hogan Assessment Systems International Company in Romania & Republic of Moldova. Starting the beginning of 2011 Hart Consulting becomes a strong partner for Cargill in Romania. We appreciate their tools and services because they are perfectly integrated within our HR processes such as selection, management
Alina Craciun, Coca-Cola Hart Human Resources Consulting is all about heart, experience, passion. We found a great partner, with a real understanding of our business needs and who, above all delivered the promised results with time to spare. Alina Craciun, Coca-Cola
